• Home
  • BVSSH
  • C4E
  • Playbooks
  • Frameworks
  • Good Reads
Search

What are you looking for?

Standard : Overplanning is avoided through progressive elaboration

Purpose and Strategic Importance

This standard ensures that planning efforts remain flexible, iterative, and responsive to change. Instead of relying on exhaustive upfront planning that often becomes obsolete, teams adopt progressive elaboration—refining plans as more is learned throughout the delivery lifecycle.

It supports the policy “Avoid Over-Planning the Future” by enabling learning-led adaptation. In dynamic environments, excessive upfront certainty can create rigidity, lead to waste, and disconnect delivery from real-time discovery. Progressive elaboration enables better decision-making and faster delivery of value.

Strategic Impact

  • Aligns planning with learning and delivery progress
  • Reduces waste from rework and abandoned plans
  • Increases team responsiveness to change and feedback
  • Keeps product strategies aligned with current context
  • Encourages shared ownership of scope and priorities

Risks of Not Having This Standard

  • Teams commit too early to features based on assumptions
  • Planning effort is wasted as priorities and conditions change
  • Change is resisted due to sunk planning costs
  • Detailed roadmaps become brittle, reducing team autonomy
  • Stakeholders lose confidence in delivery due to missed targets

CMMI Maturity Model

Level 1 – Initial

Category Description
People & Culture - Teams rely on big design and long-term certainty.
- Plans are treated as commitments rather than guides.
Process & Governance - Static planning cycles with limited adaptation.
Technology & Tools - Planning is manual and disconnected from delivery.
Measurement & Metrics - Success is measured by adherence to the original plan.

Level 2 – Managed

Category Description
People & Culture - Teams recognise change but adjust reactively.
Process & Governance - Some iterative planning; backlogs updated periodically.
Technology & Tools - Basic planning tools in place (e.g., backlog boards).
Measurement & Metrics - Replanning frequency is low; cycle time measured occasionally.

Level 3 – Defined

Category Description
People & Culture - Teams practice rolling-wave planning with cross-functional input.
- Plans are seen as hypotheses, not contracts.
Process & Governance - Iterative planning is standard across teams.
- Delivery and discovery are closely integrated.
Technology & Tools - Tools support backlog refinement, prioritisation, and reforecasting.
Measurement & Metrics - % of roadmap adjusted based on feedback and learning.

Level 4 – Quantitatively Managed

Category Description
People & Culture - Teams proactively update plans based on real-time insights.
- Planning effort is continually aligned with learning.
Process & Governance - Integrated discovery/delivery feedback loops influence planning cycles.
Technology & Tools - Forecasting tools are data-driven and continuously updated.
Measurement & Metrics - Lead time to value, scope change frequency, plan accuracy trends.

Level 5 – Optimising

Category Description
People & Culture - Planning is continuous, collaborative, and focused on outcomes.
- Teams confidently adjust scope, sequencing, and goals as needed.
Process & Governance - Strategic planning embraces uncertainty and values optionality.
Technology & Tools - Scenario modelling and dynamic planning tools support decision-making.
Measurement & Metrics - Outcomes from adaptive planning; reduction in rework and missed opportunities.

Key Measures

  • % of backlog items refined within the past sprint or quarter
  • Frequency of roadmap revisions informed by learning
  • Time spent on upfront planning vs. adaptive planning
  • % of work reprioritised or refactored based on feedback
  • Stakeholder satisfaction with planning responsiveness
Associated Policies
Associated Practices
  • Rolling Wave Planning
  • Progressive Elaboration of Work
  • Continuous Roadmap Refinement

Technical debt is like junk food - easy now, painful later.

Awesome Blogs
  • LinkedIn Engineering
  • Github Engineering
  • Uber Engineering
  • Code as Craft
  • Medium.engineering